We can't say anything concrete about how Harry Jenkins voted on voluntary student union fees
How Harry Jenkins voted compared to someone who agrees that university students should be able to choose whether or not to pay student services and amenities fees (also called student union fees)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for voluntary student union fees” which Harry Jenkins could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Harry Jenkins on this policy.
| Division | Harry Jenkins | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Nov 2010, 1:29 PM – Representatives Higher Education Legislation Amendment (Student Services and Amenities) Bill 2010 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | No |
26th Nov 2009, 4:15 PM – Representatives Higher Education Legislation Amendment (Student Services and Amenities) Bill 2009 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | No |
19th Mar 2009, 1:16 PM – Representatives Higher Education Legislation Amendment (Student Services and Amenities, and Other Measures) Bill 2009 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for voluntary student union fees” which Harry Jenkins could have attended.
| Division | Harry Jenkins | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Harry Jenkins was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.