Compare how Jane Prentice and Sarah Henderson voted on putting welfare payments onto cashless debit cards (or indue cards) on a temporary basis as a trial
![Photo of Jane Prentice](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10753.jpg)
Jane Prentice
Former Liberal Party Representative for Ryan August 2010 – May 2019
![Photo of Sarah Henderson](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10790.jpg)
Sarah Henderson
Liberal Party Senator for Victoria since September 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should create a time-limited trial of putting a large proportion of a person's welfare payment onto a debit card that cannot be used for alcohol or gambling and cannot be used to make cash withdrawals (see the policy "For putting welfare payments onto cashless debit cards (or indue cards) on an ongoing basis" for votes on extending the program indefinitely)
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for putting welfare payments onto cashless debit cards (or indue cards) on a temporary basis as a trial” which either Jane Prentice or Sarah Henderson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jane Prentice and Sarah Henderson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Jane Prentice | Sarah Henderson | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
21st Jun 2018, 12:33 PM – Representatives Social Services Legislation Amendment (Cashless Debit Card Trial Expansion) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
13th Feb 2018, 4:32 PM – Representatives Social Services Legislation Amendment (Cashless Debit Card) Bill 2017 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with the amendment to pass the bill |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
6th Feb 2018, 6:05 PM – Representatives Social Services Legislation Amendment (Cashless Debit Card) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for putting welfare payments onto cashless debit cards (or indue cards) on a temporary basis as a trial” which either Jane Prentice or Sarah Henderson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Jane Prentice | Sarah Henderson | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |