How Justine Elliot voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support the rights of transgender people (including genderfluid, nonbinary and genderqueer people) by amending laws and policies to support healthy lives by, for example, ensuring that appropriate healthcare is available nationwide and that trans people are protected from discrimination and harassment

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Justine Elliot could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Justine Elliot on this policy.

Division Justine Elliot Supporters vote

9th Feb 2022, 3:53 AM – Representatives Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

Yes No

9th Feb 2022, 2:20 AM – Representatives Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Statements of belief

No No

9th Feb 2022, 1:20 AM – Representatives Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

Yes No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Justine Elliot could have attended.

Division Justine Elliot Supporters vote

9th Feb 2022, 4:41 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with amended bill

Yes Yes

9th Feb 2022, 4:32 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Students

Yes Yes

9th Feb 2022, 4:24 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Students

No No

9th Feb 2022, 4:11 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Teachers

absent No

9th Feb 2022, 3:45 AM – Representatives Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Aged Care

No No

9th Feb 2022, 1:40 AM – Representatives Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Statements of belief

absent No

How "voted a mixture of for and against" is worked out

They Vote For You gives each vote a score based on whether the MP voted in agreement with the policy or not. These scores are then averaged with a weighting across all votes that the MP could have voted on relevant to the policy. The overall average score is then converted to a simple english language phrase based on the range of values it's within.

When an MP votes in agreement with a policy the vote is scored as 100%. When they vote against the policy it is scored as 0% and when they are absent it is scored half way between the two at 50%. The half way point effectively says "we don't know whether they are for or against this policy".

The overall agreement score for the policy is worked out by a weighted average of the scores for each vote. The weighting has been chosen so that the most important votes have a weighting 5 times that of the less important votes. Also, absent votes on less important votes are weighted 5 times less again to not penalise MPs for not attending the less important votes. Pressure of other work means MPs or Senators are not always available to vote – it does not always mean they've abstained.

Type of vote Agreement score (s) Weight (w) No of votes (n)
Most important votes MP voted with policy 100% 25 1
MP voted against policy 0% 25 2
MP absent 50% 25 0
Less important votes MP voted with policy 100% 5 4
MP voted against policy 0% 5 0
MP absent 50% 1 2

The final agreement score is a weighted average (weighted arithmetic mean) of the scores of the individual votes.

Average agreement score = sum(n×w×s) / sum(n×w) = 46.0 / 97 = 47%.

And then this average agreement score