Compare how Justine Elliot and Kate Chaney voted on ending government investment in fossil fuels

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending government investment in fossil fuels” which either Justine Elliot or Kate Chaney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Justine Elliot and Kate Chaney on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Justine Elliot	Kate Chaney	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending government investment in fossil fuels” which either Justine Elliot or Kate Chaney could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Justine Elliot	Kate Chaney	Supporters vote
9th Sep 2024, 1:09 PM – Representatives Future Made in Australia Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - National Interest Framework	No	Yes	Yes
3rd Aug 2023, 10:32 AM – Representatives Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Carbon dioxide streams	No	Yes	Yes
9th Mar 2023, 9:40 AM – Representatives National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Prohibited investments	Yes	Yes	Yes