Compare how Fiona Martin and Ken Wyatt voted on increasing transparency of big business by making information public
Fiona Martin
Former Liberal Party Representative for Reid May 2019 – May 2022
Ken Wyatt
Former Liberal Party Representative for Hasluck August 2010 – May 2022
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal govenment should increase transparency in big business (that is, companies with an income equal or more than $100 million/year or, alternatively, $200 million/year) by making certain information public, including their total income and how much tax they paid
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing transparency of big business by making information public” which either Fiona Martin or Ken Wyatt could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fiona Martin and Ken Wyatt on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Fiona Martin | Ken Wyatt | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing transparency of big business by making information public” which either Fiona Martin or Ken Wyatt could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".