How Jim Chalmers voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the amount of the age pension

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the age pension” which Jim Chalmers could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jim Chalmers on this policy.

Division Jim Chalmers Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the age pension” which Jim Chalmers could have attended.

Division Jim Chalmers Supporters vote

24th Jun 2014, 10:07 PM – Representatives Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (2014 Budget Measures No. 1) Bill 2014 and related bill - Third Reading - Read a third time

absent No

24th Jun 2014, 10:03 PM – Representatives Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (2014 Budget Measures No. 1) Bill 2014 and related bill - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bills

absent No

24th Jun 2014, 9:56 PM – Representatives Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (2014 Budget Measures No. 1) Bill 2014 and related bill - Consideration in Detail - Remove certain measures

absent Yes

24th Jun 2014, 9:13 PM – Representatives Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (2014 Budget Measures No. 1) Bill 2014 and related bill - Second Reading - Read a second time

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Jim Chalmers was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.