Compare how Jim Chalmers and Linda Burney voted on criminalising wage theft
Jim Chalmers
Australian Labor Party Representative for Rankin since September 2013
Linda Burney
Australian Labor Party Representative for Barton since July 2016
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that Employers should be able to be criminally prosecuted for intentionally stealing the wages of their employees.
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for criminalising wage theft” which either Jim Chalmers or Linda Burney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jim Chalmers and Linda Burney on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Jim Chalmers | Linda Burney | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
16th Nov 2023, 9:11 AM – Representatives Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for criminalising wage theft” which either Jim Chalmers or Linda Burney could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Jim Chalmers | Linda Burney | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |