We can't say anything concrete about how Yvette D'Ath voted on unconventional gas mining
How Yvette D'Ath voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Yvette D'Ath could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Yvette D'Ath on this policy.
| Division | Yvette D'Ath | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Yvette D'Ath could have attended.
| Division | Yvette D'Ath | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Mar 2013, 12:38 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment Bill 2013 - Consideration in Detail - Bilateral agreements |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Yvette D'Ath has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.