We can't say anything concrete about how Tim Hammond voted on increasing investment in renewable energy
How Tim Hammond voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase investment in renewable energy technologies
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing investment in renewable energy” which Tim Hammond could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tim Hammond on this policy.
| Division | Tim Hammond | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing investment in renewable energy” which Tim Hammond could have attended.
| Division | Tim Hammond | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Sep 2016, 11:17 AM – Representatives Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016 - Consideration in Detail - Maintain Australian Renewable Energy Agency funding |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Tim Hammond was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.