We can't say anything concrete about how Tim Hammond voted on the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA)
How Tim Hammond voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should fund and maintain the Australian Renewable Energy Agency, or ARENA, as an independent body that manages the government's renewable energy programs
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA)” which Tim Hammond could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tim Hammond on this policy.
| Division | Tim Hammond | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Sep 2016, 11:17 AM – Representatives Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016 - Consideration in Detail - Maintain Australian Renewable Energy Agency funding |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA)” which Tim Hammond could have attended.
| Division | Tim Hammond | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Tim Hammond was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.