We can't say anything concrete about how Meryl Swanson voted on a lower-carbon and less environmentally-damaging transportation system in Australia
How Meryl Swanson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should pass laws and policies which reduce and ultimately eliminate our reliance on fossil-fuel-based transport, and replace it with the most eco-friendly and energy efficient alternative possible
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a lower-carbon and less environmentally-damaging transportation system in Australia” which Meryl Swanson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Meryl Swanson on this policy.
| Division | Meryl Swanson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a lower-carbon and less environmentally-damaging transportation system in Australia” which Meryl Swanson could have attended.
| Division | Meryl Swanson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Aug 2022, 9:51 AM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Meryl Swanson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.