How Meryl Swanson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give greater environmental approval powers to state and territory governments by creating a single environmental assessment and approval process for nationally protected matters that is administered at state and territory level

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing state and territory environmental approval powers” which Meryl Swanson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Meryl Swanson on this policy.

Division Meryl Swanson Supporters vote

3rd Sep 2020, 5:40 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Streamlining Environmental Approvals) Bill 2020 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

absent Yes

3rd Sep 2020, 5:14 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Streamlining Environmental Approvals) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing state and territory environmental approval powers” which Meryl Swanson could have attended.

Division Meryl Swanson Supporters vote

3rd Sep 2020, 5:12 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Streamlining Environmental Approvals) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Keep second reading motion unchanged

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Meryl Swanson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.