We can't say anything concrete about how Meryl Swanson voted on supporting Israel
How Meryl Swanson voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should support Israel internationally and use its voting power in bodies such as the United Nations to demonstrate this support
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for supporting Israel” which Meryl Swanson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Meryl Swanson on this policy.
| Division | Meryl Swanson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for supporting Israel” which Meryl Swanson could have attended.
| Division | Meryl Swanson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Oct 2023, 1:23 PM – Representatives Motions - Israel - Condemns war crimes in Gaza |
absent | No |
24th Oct 2019, 11:46 AM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (International Tax Agreements) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Israel and national tax authorities |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Meryl Swanson has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.