Compare how Meryl Swanson and Vince Connelly voted on treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency” which either Meryl Swanson or Vince Connelly could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Meryl Swanson and Vince Connelly on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Meryl Swanson	Vince Connelly	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency” which either Meryl Swanson or Vince Connelly could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Meryl Swanson	Vince Connelly	Supporters vote
22nd Jun 2021, 6:52 PM – Representatives Covid-19 Disaster Payment (Funding Arrangements) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Quarantine and vaccine program	No	Yes	No
17th Jun 2021, 11:27 AM – Representatives Social Services Legislation Amendment (Portability Extensions) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Age pension and pensioners stranded overseas	No	Yes	No