Compare how Meryl Swanson and Justine Elliot voted on banning mobiles and other devices in immigration detention
Meryl Swanson
Australian Labor Party Representative for Paterson since July 2016
Justine Elliot
Australian Labor Party Representative for Richmond since October 2004
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should give the Minister the power to prohibit items such as mobile phones, SIM cards and internet capable devices for people in immigration detention facilities
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning mobiles and other devices in immigration detention” which either Meryl Swanson or Justine Elliot could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Meryl Swanson and Justine Elliot on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Meryl Swanson | Justine Elliot | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
26th Nov 2024, 4:44 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Prohibiting Items in Immigration Detention Facilities) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
2nd Sep 2020, 5:07 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Prohibiting Items in Immigration Detention Facilities) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
No | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning mobiles and other devices in immigration detention” which either Meryl Swanson or Justine Elliot could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Meryl Swanson | Justine Elliot | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |