Compare how Meryl Swanson and Tim Watts voted on getting rid of Sunday and public holiday penalty rates

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for getting rid of Sunday and public holiday penalty rates” which either Meryl Swanson or Tim Watts could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Meryl Swanson and Tim Watts on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Meryl Swanson	Tim Watts	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for getting rid of Sunday and public holiday penalty rates” which either Meryl Swanson or Tim Watts could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Meryl Swanson	Tim Watts	Supporters vote
26th Oct 2017, 10:31 AM – Representatives Fair Work Laws Amendment (Proper Use of Worker Benefits) Bill 2017 - Report from Federation Chamber - Penalty rates	Yes	Yes	No
11th May 2017, 12:11 PM – Representatives Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Vulnerable Workers) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Keep penalty rates	Yes	Yes	No