Compare how Meryl Swanson and Paul Fletcher voted on reducing tax concessions for high socio-economic status
Meryl Swanson
Australian Labor Party Representative for Paterson since July 2016
Paul Fletcher
Liberal Party Representative for Bradfield since December 2009
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should reduce tax concessions for high earners and those of high socio-economic status
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing tax concessions for high socio-economic status” which either Meryl Swanson or Paul Fletcher could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Meryl Swanson and Paul Fletcher on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Meryl Swanson | Paul Fletcher | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
9th Oct 2024, 4:17 PM – Representatives Superannuation (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions) Imposition Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with main idea of the bill |
Yes | No | Yes |
9th Oct 2024, 4:09 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions and Other Measures) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the bill |
Yes | No | Yes |
9th Oct 2024, 3:29 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions and Other Measures) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Omit schedules 1-3 |
No | Yes | Yes |
16th May 2024, 5:22 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions and Other Measures) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
Yes | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing tax concessions for high socio-economic status” which either Meryl Swanson or Paul Fletcher could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Meryl Swanson | Paul Fletcher | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||