Compare how Meryl Swanson and Lisa Chesters voted on a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which either Meryl Swanson or Lisa Chesters could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Meryl Swanson and Lisa Chesters on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Meryl Swanson	Lisa Chesters	Supporters vote
18th Feb 2021, 10:56 AM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2019 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate amendments and so pass bills	No	No	Yes
1st Dec 2020, 5:17 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2019 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	No	No	Yes
1st Dec 2020, 5:14 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea	No	No	Yes
1st Dec 2020, 5:07 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2019 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	No	No	Yes
1st Dec 2020, 5:05 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea	No	No	Yes
27th Nov 2018, 5:23 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	No	No	Yes
27th Nov 2018, 5:14 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea	No	No	Yes
27th Nov 2018, 5:03 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	No	No	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which either Meryl Swanson or Lisa Chesters could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Meryl Swanson	Lisa Chesters	Supporters vote
no votes listed