We can't say anything concrete about how Andrew Charlton voted on transgender rights
How Andrew Charlton voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support the rights of transgender people (including genderfluid, nonbinary and genderqueer people) by amending laws and policies to support healthy lives by, for example, ensuring that appropriate healthcare is available nationwide and that trans people are protected from discrimination and harassment
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Andrew Charlton could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew Charlton on this policy.
Division | Andrew Charlton | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Andrew Charlton could have attended.
Division | Andrew Charlton | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
7th Nov 2022, 4:43 PM – Representatives Anti-Discrimination and Human Rights Legislation Amendment (Respect at Work) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Objects of bill |
absent | No |
7th Nov 2022, 4:05 PM – Representatives Anti-Discrimination and Human Rights Legislation Amendment (Respect at Work) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Extending protection |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Andrew Charlton was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.