How Mark Coulton voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should encourage climate mitigation strategies, including carbon capture and storage (CCS) and marine geoengineering

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for climate change mitigation strategies” which Mark Coulton could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mark Coulton on this policy.

Division Mark Coulton Supporters vote

3rd Aug 2023, 11:48 AM – Representatives Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the bill

absent Yes

3rd Aug 2023, 10:16 AM – Representatives Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for climate change mitigation strategies” which Mark Coulton could have attended.

Division Mark Coulton Supporters vote

7th Dec 2023, 11:40 AM – Representatives Nature Repair Market (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2023 - Consideration of Senate Message - Unconventional gas production or carbon sequestration

Yes Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Mark Coulton has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.