How Wilson Tuckey voted compared to someone who agrees that Members of Parliament (MPs) and Senators should vote against all motions that stop an MP or Senator from speaking (that is, motions that the MP or Senator 'be no longer heard')

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)” which Wilson Tuckey could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Wilson Tuckey on this policy.

Division Wilson Tuckey Supporters vote

19th Mar 2008, 9:16 AM – Representatives Motions — Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Laws Bill 2008 — That the member be no longer heard

absent No

19th Mar 2008, 9:07 AM – Representatives Motions - Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Laws Bill 2008 - That the member be no longer heard

absent No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)” which Wilson Tuckey could have attended.

Division Wilson Tuckey Supporters vote
no votes listed

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Wilson Tuckey was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.