We can't say anything concrete about how Joe Hockey voted on increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators
How Joe Hockey voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal governmnet should increase parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators, such as legitimate expenditure, salary packages, superannuation entitlements and/or other allowances like the printing allowance
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators” which Joe Hockey could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Joe Hockey on this policy.
| Division | Joe Hockey | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators” which Joe Hockey could have attended.
| Division | Joe Hockey | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Oct 2006, 5:43 PM – Representatives Motions - Motion for Disallowance - Parliamentary printing allowances |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Joe Hockey was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.