We can't say anything concrete about how Sam Birrell voted on banning mobiles and other devices in immigration detention
How Sam Birrell voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give the Minister the power to prohibit items such as mobile phones, SIM cards and internet capable devices for people in immigration detention facilities
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning mobiles and other devices in immigration detention” which Sam Birrell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sam Birrell on this policy.
| Division | Sam Birrell | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Nov 2024, 4:44 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Prohibiting Items in Immigration Detention Facilities) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning mobiles and other devices in immigration detention” which Sam Birrell could have attended.
| Division | Sam Birrell | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Sam Birrell was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.