We can't say anything concrete about how Sharon Claydon voted on assisting the Arts sector through the coronavirus pandemic
How Sharon Claydon voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should develop a specific Coronavirus (COVID-19) response package for the Arts and Entertainment sector as many workers in that sector are ineligible for the JobKeeper Payment
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for assisting the Arts sector through the coronavirus pandemic” which Sharon Claydon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sharon Claydon on this policy.
| Division | Sharon Claydon | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for assisting the Arts sector through the coronavirus pandemic” which Sharon Claydon could have attended.
| Division | Sharon Claydon | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Apr 2020, 3:41 PM – Representatives Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Bill 2020 and related bills - Second Reading - Arts and entertainment sector |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Sharon Claydon has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.