We can't say anything concrete about how Sharon Claydon voted on increasing funding for legal aid
How Sharon Claydon voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase funding for the legal assistance sector (Legal Aid, community legal centres, etc.)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Sharon Claydon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sharon Claydon on this policy.
| Division | Sharon Claydon | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Sharon Claydon could have attended.
| Division | Sharon Claydon | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Sep 2018 – Representatives Family Law Amendment (Family Violence and Cross-Examination of Parties) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Access to legal representation |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Sharon Claydon has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.