Compare how Sharon Claydon and Sussan Ley voted on a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
Sharon Claydon
Australian Labor Party Representative for Newcastle since September 2013
Sussan Ley
Liberal Party Representative for Farrer since November 2001
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should unify the Federal Circuit Court of Australia and the Family Court of Australia so that they are one court to be known as the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which either Sharon Claydon or Sussan Ley could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sharon Claydon and Sussan Ley on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which either Sharon Claydon or Sussan Ley could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Sharon Claydon | Sussan Ley | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||