We can't say anything concrete about how Barnaby Joyce voted on voluntary student union fees
How Barnaby Joyce voted compared to someone who agrees that university students should be able to choose whether or not to pay student services and amenities fees (also called student union fees)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for voluntary student union fees” which Barnaby Joyce could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Barnaby Joyce on this policy.
| Division | Barnaby Joyce | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Oct 2011 – Senate Higher Education Legislation Amendment (Student Services and Amenities) Bill 2010 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | No |
18th Aug 2009, 1:40 PM – Senate Higher Education Legislation Amendment (Student Services and Amenities, and Other Measures) Bill 2009 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for voluntary student union fees” which Barnaby Joyce could have attended.
| Division | Barnaby Joyce | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Sep 2008, 9:45 AM – Senate Motions - Voluntary Student Unionism - Agree to motion |
absent | No |
11th Sep 2006, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions - End Voluntary Student Unionism |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Barnaby Joyce was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.