We can't say anything concrete about how Sharman Stone voted on increasing eligibility requirements for Australian citizenship
How Sharman Stone voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should take a restrictive approach to granting Australian citizenship by introducing more eligibility requirements, such as applicants needing greater English language proficiency and needing to spend more time living in Australia before they can submit their applications
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing eligibility requirements for Australian citizenship” which Sharman Stone could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sharman Stone on this policy.
| Division | Sharman Stone | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Nov 2014, 1:03 PM – Representatives Australian Citizenship and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing eligibility requirements for Australian citizenship” which Sharman Stone could have attended.
| Division | Sharman Stone | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Sharman Stone was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.