We can't say anything concrete about how Russell Broadbent voted on increasing the Medicare Levy to pay for the National Disability Insurance Scheme
How Russell Broadbent voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal goverment should fund the Commonwealth’s contribution to the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) by increasing the Medicare Levy for all Australians
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the Medicare Levy to pay for the National Disability Insurance Scheme” which Russell Broadbent could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Russell Broadbent on this policy.
| Division | Russell Broadbent | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Oct 2017, 10:22 AM – Representatives Medicare Levy Amendment (National Disability Insurance Scheme Funding) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the Medicare Levy to pay for the National Disability Insurance Scheme” which Russell Broadbent could have attended.
| Division | Russell Broadbent | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Oct 2017, 10:17 AM – Representatives Medicare Levy Amendment (National Disability Insurance Scheme Funding) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Disagree with bill's main idea |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Russell Broadbent was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.