We can't say anything concrete about how Michael Danby voted on increasing penalties for breach of data
How Michael Danby voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase penalties for breach of data by for-profit companies that have been contracted by the government to store sensitive information or to provide services to citizens
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing penalties for breach of data” which Michael Danby could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michael Danby on this policy.
| Division | Michael Danby | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Oct 2016, 6:20 PM – Representatives National Cancer Screening Register Bill 2016 and another - Consideration in Detail - Penalties for data breach |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing penalties for breach of data” which Michael Danby could have attended.
| Division | Michael Danby | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Michael Danby was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.