How Michael Danby voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give the private sector control over running and managing some of its services (such as public welfare, aged care and visa services) by either outsourcing or privatisation

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for privatising certain government services” which Michael Danby could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michael Danby on this policy.

Division Michael Danby Supporters vote

11th Oct 2016, 6:04 PM – Representatives National Cancer Screening Register Bill 2016 and another - Consideration in Detail - Privatisation

absent No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for privatising certain government services” which Michael Danby could have attended.

Division Michael Danby Supporters vote
no votes listed

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Michael Danby was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.