Compare how Michael Danby and David Gillespie voted on unconventional gas mining
Michael Danby
Former Australian Labor Party Representative for Melbourne Ports October 1998 – May 2019
David Gillespie
National Party Representative for Lyne since September 2013
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which either Michael Danby or David Gillespie could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michael Danby and David Gillespie on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Michael Danby | David Gillespie | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which either Michael Danby or David Gillespie could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Michael Danby | David Gillespie | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
3rd Aug 2023, 10:32 AM – Representatives Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Carbon dioxide streams |
- | absent | No |
9th Mar 2023, 9:40 AM – Representatives National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Prohibited investments |
- | No | No |
16th Jun 2014, 8:07 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Bilateral Agreement Implementation) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
No | Yes | Yes |
21st Mar 2013, 12:38 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment Bill 2013 - Consideration in Detail - Bilateral agreements |
Yes | - | No |