Compare how Michael Danby and John McVeigh voted on a citizenship test

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a citizenship test” which either Michael Danby or John McVeigh could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michael Danby and John McVeigh on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Michael Danby	John McVeigh	Supporters vote
14th Aug 2017, 6:00 PM – Representatives Australian Citizenship Legislation Amendment (Strengthening the Requirements for Australian Citizenship and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	No	Yes	Yes
14th Aug 2017, 5:50 PM – Representatives Australian Citizenship Legislation Amendment (Strengthening the Requirements for Australian Citizenship and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea	No	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a citizenship test” which either Michael Danby or John McVeigh could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Michael Danby	John McVeigh	Supporters vote
no votes listed