Compare how Lindsay Tanner and Arch Bevis voted on letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)
Lindsay Tanner
Former Australian Labor Party Representative for Melbourne March 1993 – August 2010
Arch Bevis
Former Australian Labor Party Representative for Brisbane March 1990 – August 2010
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that Members of Parliament (MPs) and Senators should vote against all motions that stop an MP or Senator from speaking (that is, motions that the MP or Senator 'be no longer heard')
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)” which either Lindsay Tanner or Arch Bevis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lindsay Tanner and Arch Bevis on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Lindsay Tanner | Arch Bevis | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
19th Mar 2008, 9:16 AM – Representatives Motions — Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Laws Bill 2008 — That the member be no longer heard |
Yes | Yes | No |
19th Mar 2008, 9:07 AM – Representatives Motions - Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Laws Bill 2008 - That the member be no longer heard |
Yes | Yes | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)” which either Lindsay Tanner or Arch Bevis could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Lindsay Tanner | Arch Bevis | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |