We can't say anything concrete about how Adam Bandt voted on increasing the Medicare Levy to pay for the National Disability Insurance Scheme
How Adam Bandt voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal goverment should fund the Commonwealth’s contribution to the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) by increasing the Medicare Levy for all Australians
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the Medicare Levy to pay for the National Disability Insurance Scheme” which Adam Bandt could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Adam Bandt on this policy.
| Division | Adam Bandt | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Oct 2017, 10:22 AM – Representatives Medicare Levy Amendment (National Disability Insurance Scheme Funding) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the Medicare Levy to pay for the National Disability Insurance Scheme” which Adam Bandt could have attended.
| Division | Adam Bandt | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Oct 2017, 10:17 AM – Representatives Medicare Levy Amendment (National Disability Insurance Scheme Funding) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Disagree with bill's main idea |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Adam Bandt was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.