Compare how Chris Bowen and Tony Zappia voted on federal action on public housing
Chris Bowen
Australian Labor Party Representative for McMahon since August 2010
Tony Zappia
Australian Labor Party Representative for Makin since November 2007
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that even though public housing is controlled by our state governments, the federal government should also take action to increase the availability of affordable public housing around Australia
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for federal action on public housing” which either Chris Bowen or Tony Zappia could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Bowen and Tony Zappia on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Chris Bowen | Tony Zappia | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
14th Sep 2023, 12:01 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Housing Measures No. 1) Bill 2023 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate amendment |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
14th Sep 2023, 11:49 AM – Representatives Housing Australia Future Fund Bill 2023 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with the Senate amendment |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
15th Feb 2023, 5:39 PM – Representatives Housing Australia Future Fund Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for federal action on public housing” which either Chris Bowen or Tony Zappia could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Chris Bowen | Tony Zappia | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||