Compare how Rob Mitchell and Anthony Albanese voted on increasing support for the Australian shipping industry
![Photo of Rob Mitchell](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10733.jpg)
Rob Mitchell
Australian Labor Party Representative for McEwen since August 2010
![Photo of Anthony Albanese](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10007.jpg)
Anthony Albanese
Australian Labor Party Representative for Grayndler since March 1996
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should increase financial and regulation-based support for the Australian shipping and maritime industry to ensure its future viability and competitiveness
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing support for the Australian shipping industry” which either Rob Mitchell or Anthony Albanese could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Rob Mitchell and Anthony Albanese on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Rob Mitchell | Anthony Albanese | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing support for the Australian shipping industry” which either Rob Mitchell or Anthony Albanese could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".