We can't say anything concrete about how Rebekha Sharkie voted on unconventional gas mining
How Rebekha Sharkie voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Rebekha Sharkie could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Rebekha Sharkie on this policy.
| Division | Rebekha Sharkie | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Rebekha Sharkie could have attended.
| Division | Rebekha Sharkie | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Aug 2023, 10:32 AM – Representatives Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Carbon dioxide streams |
absent | No |
9th Mar 2023, 9:40 AM – Representatives National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Prohibited investments |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Rebekha Sharkie was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.