Compare how Jamie Briggs and Russell Matheson voted on increasing transparency of big business by making information public
Jamie Briggs
Former Liberal Party Representative for Mayo September 2008 – July 2016
Russell Matheson
Former Liberal Party Representative for Macarthur August 2010 – July 2016
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal govenment should increase transparency in big business (that is, companies with an income equal or more than $100 million/year or, alternatively, $200 million/year) by making certain information public, including their total income and how much tax they paid
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing transparency of big business by making information public” which either Jamie Briggs or Russell Matheson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jamie Briggs and Russell Matheson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Jamie Briggs | Russell Matheson | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing transparency of big business by making information public” which either Jamie Briggs or Russell Matheson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Jamie Briggs | Russell Matheson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
12th Nov 2015, 11:24 AM – Representatives Tax Laws Amendment (Combating Multinational Tax Avoidance) Bill 2015 - Consideration of Senate Message - Disagree with the Senate's amendments |
Yes | Yes | No |
14th Sep 2015, 6:08 PM – Representatives Tax and Superannuation Laws Amendment (Better Targeting the Income Tax Transparency Laws) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
Yes | Yes | No |
14th Sep 2015, 6:00 PM – Representatives Tax and Superannuation Laws Amendment (Better Targeting the Income Tax Transparency Laws) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Against the bill |
No | No | Yes |
6th Jun 2013, 11:46 AM – Representatives Tax Laws Amendment (2013 Measures No. 2) Bill 2013 - Consideration in Detail - Reject transparency provisions |
Yes | Yes | No |