Compare how Bruce Scott and David Bradbury voted on increasing restrictions on gambling

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which either Bruce Scott or David Bradbury could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bruce Scott and David Bradbury on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Bruce Scott	David Bradbury	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which either Bruce Scott or David Bradbury could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Bruce Scott	David Bradbury	Supporters vote
29th Nov 2012, 1:55 PM – Representatives National Gambling Reform Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill	No	Yes	Yes
29th Nov 2012, 1:24 PM – Representatives National Gambling Reform Bill 2012 — Second Reading — Read a second time	No	Yes	Yes