We can't say anything concrete about how Bronwyn Bishop voted on the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA)
How Bronwyn Bishop voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should fund and maintain the Australian Renewable Energy Agency, or ARENA, as an independent body that manages the government's renewable energy programs
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA)” which Bronwyn Bishop could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bronwyn Bishop on this policy.
| Division | Bronwyn Bishop | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
1st Sep 2014 – Representatives Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Repeal) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | No |
14th Jul 2014, 5:52 PM – Representatives Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2014 — Consideration in Detail — Restore funding to ARENA |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA)” which Bronwyn Bishop could have attended.
| Division | Bronwyn Bishop | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
1st Sep 2014, 8:05 PM – Representatives Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Repeal) Bill 2014 — Second Reading — Criticise abolition of ARENA |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bronwyn Bishop was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.