Compare how Susan Lamb and Michael Keenan voted on a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
Susan Lamb
Former Australian Labor Party Representative for Longman July 2018 – May 2019
Michael Keenan
Former Liberal Party Representative for Stirling October 2004 – May 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should unify the Federal Circuit Court of Australia and the Family Court of Australia so that they are one court to be known as the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which either Susan Lamb or Michael Keenan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Susan Lamb and Michael Keenan on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Susan Lamb | Michael Keenan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
27th Nov 2018, 5:23 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
No | Yes | Yes |
27th Nov 2018, 5:14 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
No | Yes | Yes |
27th Nov 2018, 5:03 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
No | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which either Susan Lamb or Michael Keenan could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Susan Lamb | Michael Keenan | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||