Compare how Susan Lamb and Ted O'Brien voted on implementing refugee and protection conventions

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which either Susan Lamb or Ted O'Brien could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Susan Lamb and Ted O'Brien on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Susan Lamb Ted O'Brien Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which either Susan Lamb or Ted O'Brien could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Susan Lamb Ted O'Brien Supporters vote

13th Feb 2023, 4:36 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Aggregate Sentences) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Exception

- absent No

10th Nov 2016, 12:59 PM – Representatives Migration Legislation Amendment (Regional Processing Cohort) Bill 2016 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

No Yes No

10th Nov 2016, 12:53 PM – Representatives Migration Legislation Amendment (Regional Processing Cohort) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

No Yes No