We can't say anything concrete about how Emma Husar voted on making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use
How Emma Husar voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase water allocations from the Murray-Darling Basin for farmers and other users
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use” which Emma Husar could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Emma Husar on this policy.
| Division | Emma Husar | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use” which Emma Husar could have attended.
| Division | Emma Husar | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Apr 2019, 9:24 PM – Representatives Resolutions of the Senate - Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission - Don't concur with Senate resolution |
absent | Yes |
4th Apr 2019, 6:17 PM – Representatives Resolutions of the Senate - Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission - Concur with Senate resolution |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Emma Husar was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.