We can't say anything concrete about how Anika Wells voted on community right to say no to nuclear waste disposal sites
How Anika Wells voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should be required to seek the consent of local communities before selecting new sites for radioactive waste disposal
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for community right to say no to nuclear waste disposal sites” which Anika Wells could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anika Wells on this policy.
| Division | Anika Wells | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for community right to say no to nuclear waste disposal sites” which Anika Wells could have attended.
| Division | Anika Wells | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Jun 2020, 12:54 PM – Representatives National Radioactive Waste Management Amendment (Site Specification, Community Fund and Other Measures) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Anika Wells was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.