Compare how Anika Wells and Daniel Mulino voted on increasing political transparency

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which either Anika Wells or Daniel Mulino could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anika Wells and Daniel Mulino on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anika Wells	Daniel Mulino	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which either Anika Wells or Daniel Mulino could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anika Wells	Daniel Mulino	Supporters vote
4th Aug 2022, 11:59 AM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Transparency	Yes	Yes	Yes
20th Oct 2021, 5:08 PM – Representatives Committees — Privileges and Members' Interests Committee; Reference	No	No	No