Compare how Anika Wells and Daniel Mulino voted on speeding things along in Parliament (procedural)
Anika Wells
Australian Labor Party Representative for Lilley since May 2019
Daniel Mulino
Australian Labor Party Representative for Fraser since May 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that Members of Parliament (MPs) and Senators should vote to speed things along by supporting motions to 'put the question' (known as 'closure' or 'gag' motions), which require Parliament to immediately vote on a question rather than debating it any further
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for speeding things along in Parliament (procedural)” which either Anika Wells or Daniel Mulino could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anika Wells and Daniel Mulino on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for speeding things along in Parliament (procedural)” which either Anika Wells or Daniel Mulino could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Anika Wells | Daniel Mulino | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||