We can't say anything concrete about how Jason Wood voted on government administered paid parental leave
How Jason Wood voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should administer the paid parental leave scheme rather than employers
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for government administered paid parental leave” which Jason Wood could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jason Wood on this policy.
| Division | Jason Wood | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for government administered paid parental leave” which Jason Wood could have attended.
| Division | Jason Wood | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
31st May 2010, 8:32 PM – Representatives Paid Parental Leave Bill 2010, Paid Parental Leave (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2010 - Second Reading - Coalition amendments |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Jason Wood has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.