How Monique Ryan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should suspend the usual procedural rules - known as standing orders - that would otherwise prevent our representatives from considering and voting on motions related to the humanitarian disaster in Gaza that began in October 2023 and which is now the subject of an ongoing case in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in which South Africa is accusing Israel of genocide

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for considering motions on Gaza (2023-24) (procedural)” which Monique Ryan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Monique Ryan on this policy.

Division Monique Ryan Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for considering motions on Gaza (2023-24) (procedural)” which Monique Ryan could have attended.

Division Monique Ryan Supporters vote

18th Mar 2024, 12:36 PM – Representatives Motions - Middle East - Let another vote take place

absent Yes

26th Feb 2024, 12:30 PM – Representatives Motions - Middle East: Occupied Palestinian Territories - Let another vote take place

absent Yes

7th Feb 2024, 10:56 AM – Representatives Motions - Middle East - Let another vote take place

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Monique Ryan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.