We can't say anything concrete about how Kym Richardson voted on regional processing of asylum seekers
How Kym Richardson voted compared to someone who agrees that asylum seekers who arrive in Australia without a visa, particularly those who arrive by boat, should have their asylum claims processed regionally in a country such as the Republic of Nauru or Papua New Guinea (See the policy "For offshore processing of asylum seekers" for more on processing asylum seeker claims in Australian territories like Christmas Island)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for regional processing of asylum seekers” which Kym Richardson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kym Richardson on this policy.
| Division | Kym Richardson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Aug 2006, 12:57 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
10th Aug 2006, 12:46 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for regional processing of asylum seekers” which Kym Richardson could have attended.
| Division | Kym Richardson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kym Richardson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.